jump to navigation

Happy Birthday, James Joyce and Ayn Rand February 2, 2019

Posted by cybertao in Literature, random thoughts, Writing.
1 comment so far

Happy Birthday to James Joyce, born 1882, and Ayn Rand, born 1905. Joyce said: “The demand that I make of my reader is that he should devote his whole life to reading my works.” Ayn Rand’s readers really do devote their whole lives to reading her works.

But Rand was not a fan of his works. In her book “What Art Is” she said his fiction is not art at all because of it’s “elaborately contrived inaccessibility.” She also said Samuel Beckett was not an artist. Beckett was Joyce’s secretary when Joyce was writing “Finnigann’s Wake.” Beckett relates how a mistake got into the book, but no one would know the difference. “We were working on what became Finnegan’s Wake, and there was a knock at the door. I didn’t hear it, so when Joyce said, ‘Come in’ I wrote down ‘Come in’. I never took it out. It made as much sense as anything else. I like to imagine earnest literary students writing theses on the meaning and implications of that ‘Come in’ in the book.”

Rand was not the only female writer to have harsh words for Joyce. While the debate over whether Joyce or Virginia Woolf was the greater master of the stream-of-consciousness style of writing may continue, there is no doubt where she stood when she described his “Ulysses” as “The work of a queasy undergraduate scratching his pimples.” But in the end, perhaps Katherine Mansfield had the strongest reaction to his work: “This [Ulysses] is obviously the wave of the future, I’m glad I’m dying of tuberculosis.”

Happy Birthday, Lloyd Alexander January 30, 2019

Posted by cybertao in Literature, Philosophy, random thoughts.
add a comment

“I felt myself in a solitude so frightful that I contemplated suicide. What held me back was the idea that no one, absolutely no one, would be moved by my death, that I would be even more alone in death than in life.” – Jean-Paul Sartre, “Nausea”

When my daughter was little I bought her a book called “The Incredible Journey of Prince Jen” and I was shocked to notice that the author had the same name as the translator of Nausea. What I coincidence, I thought, they can’t be the same person for surely the translator must be a philosophy professor. Well, today would have been the 95th birthday of Lloyd Alexander, who, while writing dozens of children’s books including The Black Cauldron, which won the Newberry Award and was made into a Disney movie, for some unknown reason decided to take a break from kid stuff and translate things like this:

“I dreamed vaguely of killing myself to wipe out at least one of these superfluous lives. But even my death would have been in the way. In the way, my corpse, my blood on these stones, between these plants, at the back of this smiling garden. And the decomposed flesh would have been in the way in the earth which would receive my bones, at last, cleaned, stripped, peeled, proper and clean as teeth, it would have been in the way: I was in the way for eternity.”

Is Rand Relevant? March 14, 2009

Posted by cybertao in Money, Politics, random thoughts.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

That’s the title of an op-ed, referring to Ayn Rand, in today’s Wall Street Journal by Yaron Brook, president and executive director of the Ayn Rand Institute.  The answer is “yes,” perhaps now more than ever.

You can read it here:  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123698976776126461.html

The article is very short.  A more detailed explanation is available in an interview with Dr. Brook here: http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2009-spring/ayn-rand-atlas-shrugged.asp

As a teenager in Russia during the Communist Revolution, Rand saw the state confiscate her father’s pharmacy business.  At once  appalled by the collectivist policies of her country while falling in love with the idea of the freedom and capitalism of America, she decided to be a writer to promote individualism.  And write she did as soon as she learned English well enough since she wanted to write, not in Russian, but in her adopted language.

Her 1957 novel, Atlas Shrugged, is now one of the best selling books on Amazon due to it’s ominous parallels to today’s political scene – the clash between the capitalists, thinkers, creators and actual workers on the one hand and the hangers-on, welfare collectors and the government bureaucrats that enable them on the other.  Rand thought that capitalism, rather than being  something evil, is the only moral economic system, because it is the only system that promotes true liberty by allowing each person to create and trade in his or her rational self interest to the best of his or her ability without limitation or interference.

At over 1,000 pages of small print reading Atlas Shrugged is a project.  An easy introduction to her thought is Anthem, at only about 100 pages of larger print.  Somewhere in the middle is The Fountainhead, which was made into a movie starring Gary Cooper (it would be interesting to compare his character as the architect in The Fountainhead with his character as the sheriff in High Noon).  In fact, the Ayn Rand Institute offers essay contests on these three novels:  Anthem for 8th, 8th and 10th graders, The Fountainhead for 11th and 12th graders, and Atlas Shrugged for college students and graduating high school seniors.

Rand sums up her work as: “My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute.”

She adds: “My personal life is a postscript to my novels; it consists of the sentence: ‘And I mean it.‘”

Thoughts on the Olympics August 25, 2008

Posted by cybertao in Olympics, random thoughts, Sports, Uncategorized.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

All in all the games went well.  Smog was not an issue and there were no terrorist attacks.  The suppression of free speech certainly should not have been unexpected.  I’m proud of the Americans.  They performed well with the track team being the exception, but more importantly they behaved well.  There were no incidents that I know of involving Americans, like the Cuban tae kwan do guy who kicked the ref in the face because he lost.  The USA men’s basketball team even raised over a half million dollars for the children who were  victims of the earthquakes in China.

It makes me wonder why we in the US are always being told white men can’t play basketball.  All of the other top national teams in the world are either all or predominately white.  That being the case, their games against the US superstars, all of whom are black, should have been blow-outs like the Harlem Globetrotters against the Washington Generals, but for the most part they were not.  There are a lot of good white players in the world, but not in the US.  Almost all of the top white players in the NBA are foreigners.  Don’t forget, even though Steve Nash’s native language is English, he is Canadian.  Why is it that the US can’t produce better white players?  Just asking.

What is unfair about basketball?  It only counts as one medal.  Why is it that in swimming you can get a gold medal (and Phelps did) everytime you swim across the pool, and track is similar in that you can be in multiple events.  In gymnastics you could potentially get a medal for team competition, all-around, and each individual event.  But in team sports a number of players have to play multiple games just to get one medal.  Sure each person on the team gets a medal, but in the country’s medal count, it is only considered as one.  Maybe there should be just one medal for swimming.  After all, the point is to get from one end of the pool to the other.  Who cares whether you use a dog paddle or a butterfly?  Or maybe there should be multiple medals for basketball – one for best dribbling, one for best dunking, passing, free throws, jump shots, 3 pointers, falling on your butt to make it look like you’re taking a charge, etc.

What about those tiny Chinese gymnasts?  The point is not only that they look young, but that Chinese documents from previous competitions have been listing them as young enough that they would not now be eligible for the Olympics.  Apparently, we’re expected to believe all of those listings were mistakes and what the Chinese government says now is correct.  One mistake maybe, but the coincidence of so many mistakes is unbelievable.  And don’t forget that a Chinese gymnast from a previous Olympics said she was younger than the age listed.

I’ve always thought that opening ceremonies were a silly waste of time and money, but this one was downright creepy with the militaristic overtones reminiscent of the Nazis in the 1936 Olympics.  Director of the ceremony Zhang Yimou was quoted in various publications, including the London Telegraph, as saying: “Number one is North Korea.  Their performances are totally uniform, and uniformity in this way brings beauty.  We Chinese can do it too.  After hard training and strict discipline. . . . Like the moveable type cubes (in the opening ceremony) the performers follow orders.  The actors listen to the orders, and carry them out like computers.  Foreigners admire this.  This is the Chinese spirit.”  Here is one foreigner who does not admire people being turned into robots.  Yimou is the most famous Chinese movie director having directed many famous movies including Hero, The Curse of the Golden Flower and House of Flying Daggers.  The opening ceremony reminded me of The Curse of the Golden Flower where the garden in front of the palace was covered with millions of chrysanthemums, each an exact replica of the other.  After an epic battle the flowers are all destroyed and the garden is covered by millions of dead soldiers.  Then thousands of workers come out to drag off the bodies and replace the millions of flowers, each an exact replica of the other.  Only a few characters, the royal, dysfunctional family, have any personalities.  The multitudes are automatons just as are the performers in the opening ceremony.  I had thought that The Curse of the Golden Flowers was meant as criticism of the Chinese government, but from Yimou’s comments, apparently not.  Certainly his early film Raise the Red Lantern was, but he has changed from somewhat of a rebel to become part of the the communist establishment.

OK, enough of this negative stuff.  What was my favorite moment of the entire Olympics?  Shelly-Ann Fraser’s reaction when she won the women’s 100 meter dash.  I have no connection to Jamaica and never heard of her before, but her reaction to winning was priceless.  She was the youngest and shortest and no one expected her to win, yet she won easily.  She was just so happy – as you should be when you win – bouncing up and down on the track afterwards.  Her braceface smile is infectious and she should be in a promotional video for the next Olympics.  If you missed it, check it out on YouTube.